Readers will need to have patience

Return Viewer's Guide For Use With A Small Backyard Telescope

returnviewersguide.ca

Patience

Readers will need to have lots of patience.

I can think of many reasons why
readers will need to have lot's of patience,
I call it "the idea of patience."
For example, to start with;

Many pages are blank and incomplete. I'm working on it.
This website will always be under construction and will always be a work in progress.
(Best viewed 1024 X 768)

Overall I know that for people, the reader, patience alone won't be enough.
At least me mentioning the idea of patience is a place to start.
Past this point readers are just going to have to realize that when I write the basic point for me is accurate descriptions concerning what I saw.
As it happens, the problem is that I saw something that falls into a different category compared to the things that people are used to hearing about.

From what is now multiple sources, comments and concerns raised;
Concerning my writing style.

I write out of frustration and even desperation and from the perspective of having seen the Object and what happens to the light from the Moon when the Object crosses down in front of the Moon in a world that appears to me to be basically oblivious.

Also it is surely worthwhile for me to mention again that I am not actually any sort of a real writer, and never claimed to be the way a writer is normally professional and all.

This is a point that is a factor although the fact is, this point is not at the heart or root of the problem for many people.

My writing style although bad and unprofessional is actually irrelevant and unimportant and is simply an easy target for people who don't like the way the true facts and the way the details of what really happens in our planet's area of space sound to them.

Also I point out ideas, theories or rather guesses related to our worlds greatest ancient mysteries that are totally completely hopeless off.
I give some examples on the page Nobody Lives There
If I don't describe things the way they really are then I'm actually not saying anything, and in that case I would be failing to meet my responsibilities to the truth of the Object and the Lasting Light from the Moon and to everyone of you..

There's no way that people are going to like what I write or how I write it.
No matter how I write it or how it is written, by anyone, anytime.
Once again readers are just going to have to realize that when I write the basic point for me is accurate descriptions concerning what I saw.

All considerations past this point are just to big and numerous for me to know never mind take into account with every word I write.
A great many of these considerations are very important and some are less important but either way it's simply not up to me to try to somehow satisfy everyone concerning every single possible consideration.

The reader, all of the individual people of the Earth, are solely responsible in the end when the Object returns to try to somehow sort all of this out and ultimately deal with it.
That's what I have had to do and this is what's going to happen.

As it happens the truth of the Object and the Moon's Lasting Light is the very difficult reality of the way things really are and it's not my job to somehow try to make it easy or worry about how the facts of the returning Object sound to people although as always I do worry.
I saw the Object and I do describe the sight of the Moon's changed and Lasting Light and it is very hard and it is very difficult and I know it's upsetting. I know this is terribly upsetting and difficult. This is a huge point and I know this for myself only to well.

If you saw this some thirty plus years ago and you knew about the Object, would you feel as though you should say something about it?
Would you feel as though you had a responsibility?
Would you care about the things that are actually meaningless and completely unimportant compared to what you knew to be true concerning the returning Object and all the details of what happens to the light from the Moon as far as you saw and knew it and were able to understand it?
Would you feel as though you had a responsibility and an obligation to anyone?

If you did try to report what you had seen and you started to receive complaints about your writing style, the way you actually wrote things down for what you knew to be the benefit of every single person on the planet, could you care less about the opinions of those who actually took the time to complain?

My job is to accurately report what I saw.
Beyond this point eventually it's going to be every individual person's own responsibility to deal with this for themselves.
I am not responsible for the degree of difficulty or for anything else beyond writing accurate descriptions.

There's no way I can make this easy so that readers are better able to deal with this as though they are going to eventually accept the descriptions I offer as being fact and still write accurate descriptions.
The Object's return as I describe and only then is the point in time when the facts as I describe will become clear.
Also obviously there is no way to make this difficult situation easy.

I am not trying to prove to readers that the Object as I describe exists.

Mr. W. Spill also saw the same object May 24th 1926 and he was completely unable to prove that the Object exists.
Me trying to actually prove that the Object exists is obviously a complete total waist of my time.

The Object's next return orbit down across between the Earth and the Moon will take care of all the impossible proving that some people mistakenly feel is my job now.

Things are going to happen very very fast and then the Object will be gone again, just like the last time.
Picture this; if I wait until the Object is suddenly sighted and known to people, what then?
Me standing there, or sitting here saying I TOLD YOU SO... is going to do a lot of good... isn't it... well isn't it...?

I don't like any shouting either... anyway's.

Once again, me trying to actually prove that the Object exists is obviously a complete total waist of my time, and simply an impossibility.

Trying to write so that it's easy or somehow easier for readers is also impossible and if I did try to do this I would not be doing my job. Trying to write so that it's easy or somehow easier for readers would mean that I would fail and I would not be meeting and living up to my obligations and responsibilities.

I can describe the Object and what happens to the Moon's light.
This is something I can easily do without having to concern myself with whether or not people believe my descriptions.
For me this is simple and definitely basically easy.

Credibility is not point of concern for me because I am able to understand that it will take the return of the Object and the sight of the Moon's changed and Lasting Light before people think of me and my Return descriptions as being credible.

In the meantime I know that people are not going to actually believe or like my descriptions.
As it turns out this is not a way to make friends.
My obligation is to provide accurate descriptions of the truth of the Object and what actually happens to the Moon's light between the Earth and the Moon when the Object returns.

My job is to say what I saw.

Doing my job in such a way as to try to please or cater to what people are willing to accept or believe or what they are willing to hear or know about would definitely be a shameful act on my part.

My obligation is to the truth of the Object and especially my obligation is to the truth about the sights that happen in the Moon's changed and Lasting Light.

It's taken thirty plus years but I've been forced to realize that my obligation is an ancient one,
an obligation that is to the ancient truth of the Moon's changed and Lasting Light.
I am obligated to my children, my parents, and my family.

It turns out that I also have an obligation to everyone today and an obligation to every person in the future.
I do provide very accurate descriptions and I know that I'm absolved.
These are the facts.
I am in no way obligated to try to write so that it pleases people who have no idea concerning the facts of a Return event.

I hear so much about humanities search for truth. What is this suppose to mean?
I don't know because that's all out of my area.

There is the truth of the Object and the truth of what the Object does with the light from the Moon.
This is the area of truth that is within my area of things.
So far for me it appears as though the vast majority of the people today who have heard about the Object and The Moon's Lasting Light because of this web site just don't know the details of the Object or what happens to the Moon's light during a Return Event.

It turns out that me trying to cater to the sensibilities of people today is not a part of my job description.
I am not responsible for the sensibilities or the beliefs of today's world. What a ridiculous notion, obviously.
The notion that I am somehow suppose to write in such a way as to try to actually please the reader of today is also a completely ridiculous notion.
I can't do what is impossible.

I am sure that as long as a person who is describing a Return event in writing, is actually doing so in an accurate manner, there could not be any writing style no matter how professional that would satisfy.
In the end surly it's not the writing style that's the problem.
The facts of a Return, the Object and the Lasting Light event that is generated is the upsetting thing.
So lets not beat around the bush and play all sorts of meaningless games about the problem being my writing style.

I do write accurate descriptions of the Object and the Lasting Light event that it causes.
I am fulfilling my very real obligations by doing this website.

Once again very clearly, obviously, I'M ABSOLVED!!! whether anyone likes my writing style or not.

(Best viewed 1024 X 768)

All sorts of browser display problems and issues.
(Best, viewed using I.E. and perhaps some other browser types as well.)
That's all I can say...
Displaying perfectly in all, browser types would be nice but that is far from the point of this website.

- Recently in some cases for the first time, I have looked over some of the pages that I have not looked at basically since I wrote them two years ago.
Overall I have taken a break from writing for these web pages and instead I have been writing in notebooks. The last months I have not done much writing at all up until recently when I've started to look at our website again. Overall I just can't seem to do this everyday.
Obviously I don't understand how to use quotation marks correctly. Actually I'm amazed that someone hasn't pointed this out to me.
In fact my liberal use of quotation marks as a way to try to highlight important points drives me crazy when I read through the pages I wrote back in 2005. I can only imagine that this effect is even worse for people who understand when quotation marks should and shouldn't be used. I have started to remove many quotation marks however this will be a process and will take time. Your patience is appreciated.

-The names of things should start with a capital letter. I didn't start off writing with this idea in mind.
For example; The Object, and The Lasting Light, should be capitalized. In many or even in most places you will find; the object and the lasting light and other names for things incorrectly written in lower case. I try to notice this error and capitalize whenever I notice this type of mistake. This is not a grave error however a name for something is a name and should be capitalized. Once again your patience is appreciated.

- My pages are too long. Yes I know this.
Quite a few people have pointed this out to me.
More than once the apparent fact that "busy people, don't have time," has been mentioned to me.
Instead of always writing somewhere else were you can't read it, I've decided to also write a bit about the Return that I saw here were you can read it.

- As I mentioned, the page titles on this website are meant to be a general topic or focus to write about. In the meantime I'm all over the place writing about this and that and or the next new thing that I find out about.
- If you have the time and you decide to read you will gradually find out more and more about what happens when the object returns.
- If you are interested and you read what I write thanks, and I hope that I have been of some help.
- If you are interested and you don't read what I write here perhaps one day you'll get around too it. At that point you'll start to find out what happens during a Return and I hope that at that point I hope that I will have been of some help.

- I don't know how to condense what I know into a quick two minute version for the busiest people out there.
That's not a main point for me anyway's.
On the other hand if you only have two minutes, or three minutes, reading "Return Viewer's Guide #1," located about 20% of the way down the page;
Return Viewer's Guide For Use With A Small Backyard Telescope ,
will give you a quick two or perhaps three minute glimpse of the first part of what happens when the object returns.
- If a person wants to know a little bit about the big thing that happens, up there, they can read about it here,
on these pages that I offer, it's up to them.
- It's up to you.

(Suddenly a while back before May 2005 I found myself suddenly worried that the object might arrive back May 2005 much sooner than it should be here. Obviously it seems as if my extra worrying was unwarranted. I wrote the below before May 2005. Instead of removing the below I am leaving it in because of the continuing possibility of an earlier than expected Return.
May 24 2013 may not be when the object arrives but this date is my first choice.
It is very obvious that the object may orbit down across in front the Moon at any point in time before or after the May 24 2013 date that I suggest as my most likely Return date.)

Does the object suddenly revert back to some sort of shorter orbital time period?
Does the object also suddenly cross down between the Earth and Moon at position that is much closer to the Earth compared to were the object crossed between the Earth and Moon during the last Return?
Basically either the object just simply always orbits farther out from the Earth or it doesn't.
The object has a crossing position between the Earth and Moon that is suddenly closer to the Earth or it doesn't. Either the orbital time period is around 44 years or so and it never is suddenly shorter or it's orbital time period does become suddenly shorter.
Unfortunately these are real and very valid questions to be asking and unfortunately the time to ask them is now.

Could the object actually suddenly return after having only been gone for thirty five years when the last return occurred approximately forty four years after the second last return? I don't know, that's the problem for me. May 24th 1926, then approximately 1970.
The object will be back, but when?
If it does return sooner and closer surely it could not be by as much as eight years sooner than expected.

I know the big place is rolling down towards us by now and I know it will only be a hand full of years before the object returns.

The object's small size could cause confusion among observers who could miscalculate the object's distance from the Earth.
The object is much smaller than the Moon.

This fact could case great problems for observers who think they are looking at a regular or normal "star," sized object.
Also I know that there is a wide assortment of celestial objects. I know very little about these various types of objects. Also I have no perspective concerning the sizes of these various objects. I can only suppose that most or a great many of these types of object's that are observed and studied today are basically big.
I would think that the various sizes encountered range from big, to very big, and quite often extremely big, all the way through to and past incomprehensibly extremely large and also always far away.
The object is smaller that the Moon.
Will the fact that the returning object is smaller than the Moon be recognized and understood at the time the object is detected returning?

Maybe the people who see the returning object first will be able to clearly see and easily understand that the object is smaller that the moon and this concern is not an issue.
The returning object is definitely smaller than the Moon.

The object is traveling down towards the area below the Sun at a tremendous speed.
The object can only take a couple short minutes, or less to travel the distance between the Earth and Moon.

Also, the object rolls down towards the Earth from the area of space above, and to the left of the Moon as seen from Mississauga Ontario Canada.
The exact time of the last Return is known because the object blocked the signals from the scientific instruments that Apollo crews left on the surface of the moon.
The solar systems exact orientation at the time of the return that I saw is known, but unrecognized.
At the very least, the correct general region of space to look for the returning object could be determined.
The date and time of the "Apollo Detection," is critical in this question.
I saw the object that blocked the signals from the surface of the Moon.
This fact is plainly obvious to me.
I understand that we do need to see or somehow detect, the object before it returns this time.
This is obviously very basic.

I read an ancient text that describes the object and the changed light from the Moon that I describe. This same ancient text mentions a 35 years time frame.
My concern is this; Does the 35 years that is mentioned in this ancient text point to a possible suddenly shorter Return time period? Instead of returning by approximately May 2013 as the last two return dates would or could or should suggest, does the object suddenly return early? 35 five years is mentioned and I understand that a 38 year time period is also possibly significant. I know the object is basically lining itself up with the Earth right now as a part of it's orbital course down towards and past the Earth.
That part is easy.
In the area of a possible sudden closer and sooner than expected orbit down past the Earth I can only grasp at straws. The big place will be back sooner or later. The 1970 date along with the 35 year time frame mentioned in the very credible ancient text I am referring to could possibly see a Return within three days before to three days after the night of the full Moon in the month of May 2005. I am very hopeful that I will look back on this month we are in now with great relief, finally able to sleep again knowing that there is still time left and that all the worrying about May / 05 was for not.

I understand that a Return in May 2013 is more likely but I know the object is real and I am able to realize and understand that there really is a chance that the object could return during this month, May 2005. That is why I am posting incomplete pages and making an effort to get this information out there so that this will be known.
I realize this is very much to difficult to actually believe but that's not the point for me. I understand that it is important that people, all sorts of people, have a chance to hear about this sooner rather than later. I try to expand on these thoughts and concerns.
Thank you for your patience.
--------

-I have realized that I mention both May 24th 2013 and May 2014 in separate areas within the pages on this website. I feel as though the full Moon , May 25, 2013 which relates to the Maya three quarters May 23rd 2013 date, (May 24th 2013) presents a higher return probability than the May 14, 2014 date. I will comment more to follow. I have mentioned the 2014 date at various points and as far as I know anything is possible so I don't want to discount 2014. I am more focused on May 2013 because of the timing and circumstances I try to describe that relate to the second last return date of May 24, 1926.
This Return occurred three days before that month's full moon.
I have heard about a Maya, three quarters May 23rd date.
Also mentioned as significant was the May 20 date and an associated six day range.
I do see that I have included May 2014 within these pages and I don't want to cause confusion over the points I am trying to make. I really don't know what sorts of Return dates are possible so I don't want to discount any date. However overall I think I might start to remove the 2014 dates in favor of the possible May 24th 2013 Return date when I find them within these pages.
I talk about the "Apollo Detection," and I look forward to hopefully hearing the date and time that this occurred.
Obviously this would be a very good point to work from.

--------

-I am not a writer. I am just an ordinary Dad who happened to see a fantastic thing when I was a kid. These days I have found myself writing. My amateur writing style really shows through. Actually you could easily say that I don't even have an amateur writing style.

-When I read through what I write, I always find many types of errors.
-When I read through what I write, I always accidentally leave behind all sorts of writing errors.

-I have noticed display problems within various browsers. For some reason my pages are not displaying correctly within some browsers. Pages position may jump around. I will eventually look into this problem again to see if I can correct the problem. I don't understand various display issues that relate to different browser types.

-I tend to repeat myself, a lot. I struggle to describe the sights that I saw.
I have to find ways and words, to describe the indescribable, the sight, of what should be impossible!
In an effort to build some sort of gradually clearer picture, I write many overlapping descriptions of the same things.
My hope is that together these descriptions may slowly start to build toward some sort of a picture of a Return and the first part of the visual spectacle that the returning object generates with the Moon's light.

-This type of repeating, overlapping, writing effect is seen within all of the different pages I plan to post on this site. Each separate page title, is only intended to provide a general focus for the page.
A Return is an incredibly complicated interconnected series of very fast pasted events.
I am unable to completely separate one subject from another.
I think that the only way to try to start to understand the picture I'm trying to draw of my view is to read the various separate descriptions that I write.

-I only saw the big rolling place.
To me all, of my descriptions, sound hollow and are completely lacking and inadequate.
I can only try my best to describe and explain my view of the last Return. I am rushing through this first version of this website because of the Return Prediction and Preparation Issues that relate to May / 05.
I realize that my concerns that relate to May / 05 in all likely hood are all for not and the Return will not be for many years, hopefully no less than eight or so. In the mean time I am able to realize that May / 05 is a possibility although a very small possibility and also from then onwards whenever the Moon is right but especially whenever the Moon is right in May. As a result of the rush that I am in many pages are only going to very briefly touched on in the area of discussion that the page title points too.
I have to make this compromise although I really am not comfortable with posting pages that are very much incomplete.

If you have a question and there is any way I can help, ask me. In a strange way it turns out that some of you, know more about this than me.
What I mean is I need to know what you know so that we can all understand better.
I know that sounds strange but it turns out that that's how it works for me.
The big thing I saw goes with what you know. I don't know what you know.
On this website I am trying to describe what I saw. I am sharing what I saw with you. Ask me about and show me what you know and together we will both know more. This does work but in a backwards sort of way.

-I am always seeing and reading ancient things that are knew to me. As a result a lot of the things I thought I knew about how a Return is related to history become suddenly totally obsolete or confusing. I can give many examples of this. As far as this area of this Return business is concerned, it will always be other people, and the things that they know, who will realize and understand how the object and the fantastic visual spectacle it generates, relate to history. This may be true but these new realizations and understandings that we will all have can surly only always be incomplete. This is always a basic reality for me. Soon this reality will be same for everyone.

This relates to and describes a big problem for me. I always am discovering that many if the things that I thought I knew, are suddenly wrong.
Just to start with, the names for things.
For instance I use to think that the object was Olympus. Now I know that this is not the case.
Olympus is the oval shaped area, or it is a place within the oval shaped area of changed Moon light that used to be brought forth at one time, the plain, the light from the surface of the Moon.
At first I did not realize this and it seemed only natural and logical to me that Olympus was the object itself especially after seeing what happens there within the Moon's changed light.

The object itself in many stories may be the mysterious and/or shinning island, that many of these ancient stories seem, to incorporate, or at least I think it might be. Also I know that there is always a chance that a place, "especially any shining place or thing," may be the Moon's changed light.

Just because I think I know what is being referred to by the ancient name for something it doesn't mean that I am right. In this case I can explain many reasons why I think I'm right but that obviously definitely does not mean that there's no question about it and I'm right in every case all the time.
I know the sights that I saw but I am not always able to match up all of the different names with every different thing that I saw. Then there's the vast array of names and terms for the rest of the things a Return does with the Moon's light that I didn't see.
Then there's me scratching around on the surface.

This very quickly gets into an area that's big and not my fault.
It really is not my fault that I was not able to figure this all out instantly and without error.
I still haven't figured it all out, and there's no way that that will ever happen. The whole thing is just to confusing for many difficult confusing reasons.

Just to start with I didn't see the whole thing, the lasting light event, that happened last Return and I believe that the whole event itself didn't actually happen during the last Return.
A big part of the problem for me is if I didn't see it I just simply don't know it first hand for myself. I have discovered that ancient depictions and texts describe what the changed light does next but it's from all sorts of confusingly different angles and all jumbled out of order many times. Plus I find myself reading what people think this or that is and what meaning, the "consensus," points to and has settled on.

The result for me is I sometimes am able to gleam useful information but usually I end up confused and understanding less about what happens next as opposed to understanding more and this is very true concerning the names of the things that are seen happening, elements and events that are changed light.
Part of this problem also relates to the fact that I simply don't usually have access to the basic facts or texts themselves and I instead have limited exposure to the real sources that would really help me understand more. I am mainly going through the conclusions of others and other people's facts, and very often this does not work for me.
-------------
- I use to do a lot of apologizing.
I still do a lot of apologizing but thankfully, I apologize to everyone about everything, a lot less these days. However it did and does not matter which way I turn, I felt and feel as though I need to apologize. It starts at a very basic level and then goes right up through everything, from there.
I always feel as though I need and have to always apologize for not being about to think about this, and explain and describe this a long time ago.
If I do explain and describe this, right away I feel as though I should start and end with some sort of apology. For me it never ends. I've never known what to do say or think about this.

- Sorry but, it's not my fault that there is an object, but there is an object. Somehow it exists, but I had nothing to do with it.
I know that, " but I had nothing to do with it," is obviously a ridiculous statement.
Somehow my thinking becomes irrational and I just begin to feel as though there is a certain amount of blame that is automatic.
Instantly I know that it's me who gets the blame, just for mentioning it.
This is one of those for your information, things.
This situation is completely beyond complicated on one hand but on the other hand, I just saw it, simple.
It's this big huge thing that rolls by, "over there."
Also, by the way, it does this great big huge fantastic thing!

- As I struggle to imagine people realizing that this has nothing to do with me, I try to realize the same thing for myself. I'm over here, with everyone else, and when I looked over there, this big huge place rolled by, not my fault. This should be a simple thing to realize!
Unfortunately I am afraid that if I can't even stop my completely irrational, "somehow blaming myself," what about other people, everyone else? I know that it's irrational to feel blame, but I do.
I know that it's irrational for anyone to blame me, but I'm afraid that's also exactly what some will do.
I just saw it, leave me out of it.
If a guy looked through the valley and saw a fire, on the other side of the valley, and then pulled the fire alarm, what then?

- Sorry but, it's not my fault that lots, of basic knowledge has been somehow lost through time, but a great deal of basic knowledge actually was somehow lost through time, obviously not my fault.

- Sorry but, it's not my fault that both the object itself and especially the visual spectacle that it generates with the Moon's suddenly changed light, are almost completely misunderstood. Or more like totally completely misunderstood by the world but it does seem to appear as if the object and the Lasting Light event that the object causes, are basically completely totally misunderstood... known but unknown, depending on how you look at it, also obviously, not my fault.

- Sorry but, from the time of my view of this returning orbiting object and repeating Lasting Light event, I have had tremendous difficulties remaining actually thinking about my view, if I ever suddenly was actually thinking about basically any of my view. Without me realizing it, that entire area of thinking would always just simply shutdown.
Realizing that this effect was occurring was a small first step for me.
Realizing that this effect was occurring did not stop the shutting down, effect from happening, but I was eventually able to start to gradually begin to hang on for longer before some time later, even months later sometimes, I would once again be startled, by the realization that I was suddenly thinking about it again.
A difficult thing for me to understand and then try to explain. I feel bad about it, and and I am always apologizing and saying that I'm sorry, and I am sorry, but, I have gradually begun to realize that the fact that this effect was happening to me, and still does to some degree, was and is, simply not my fault.
It turns out that this difficult area is directly related to the way the changed light suddenly forcefully exerts pressure, on you seconds after it finishing it's inward pulsing and narrows down and focuses on you if you are looking.
This very real and difficult and truly fantastic area is beyond my ability to adequately describe but I do try to explain and describe this penetrating intense effect that the viewer really does see and feel forced into them.

- Sorry but, it's not my fault that by some sort of ultimate luck, if you want to call it "luck," and I have never thought of any of this as "being lucky," I suppose strangely even, but I have never thought of myself as being lucky, but by some sort of ultimate lucky fluke, I did see the big rolling place.
My view is 100% genuine.
Seeing is far from being easy.
In fact actually seeing, even from just the first sight of the object well before the shadow actually strikes, could very easily be thought of as being a heart attack inducing sight!

The terrifying sight of the huge massive boulder bearing down on the telescope aided viewer's position, will stricken all or very nearly all viewer's with total fear, from the very first instant of their view.
From the very first glimpse of the big rolling place, the degree of difficulty always only goes strait up! I understand that I can't adequately describe the shocking sight of the big rolling crater covered boulder and it turns out that it's not my fault that I can't find the words.

Then there is the difficult problem concerning adequately describing the sight of the changed light. Phase one of the changed light is fantastic enough and is peaceful and tranquil in comparison to what follows nearly instantly after the Awesome Good turns around and gets up to face to face you.
Then suddenly phase two of the changed light focuses on you and exerts an overwhelming pressure that you actually feel, a pressure and a feeling that literally shakes you up inside all the way to the place inside were the light ends up going. A very real and difficult physical effect and reaction, although not painful or even unpleasant, that instantly happens when you see and you are forced, to realize.
Also the sights that you are suddenly seeing during this time are stunningly difficult to know that you are seeing. I know that my descriptions at this point describe what anyone with any common sense would know is impossible. That's part of the point.
Suddenly the viewer sees one impossible thing happening after another in combination with the light's pressure that is an actual feeling and the sensation of the light moving along it's route through you. Suddenly the viewer is in, and literally faced with a situation that is just simply beyond belief!
If you've seen you know, now try to explain this sort of an experience so that it is possible for others to realize that this is true. That is a situation that is also impossible.

When my descriptions get to the end of the Black Road, and suddenly you are reading about how the viewer is suddenly looking down on the back of the Awesome Good from above and behind you are obviously not going to be able to believe that this could be true.
From this point onwards every second, every instant I describe and every word I write only sounds more impossible and unlikely and that's the effect that keeps happening.
You are always going to be more and more sure that none of this could have happened because this sort of thing is just simply impossible. One day when you hopefully see this for yourself you will then instantly be able to start to relate to this impossible situation I am in now as far as writing believable descriptions is concerned.

I am going to keep trying to write descriptions that make sense to me. When it's your turn to see and "get noticed," and then suddenly feel the Moon's changed light's force and pressure, my descriptions will suddenly begin to make sense to you.
That's what happen's to me when I read ancient descriptions of the same things that I saw. Suddenly I will just simply know exactly what the ancient writer saw and was writing about. If we saw the same thing we know the same thing.
Many ancient things that I read can only be describing one thing, or one of the many things that a viewer sees during a Return.
Even though this sounds impossible, it isn't.
After the next Return you will have seen and you will know and this will make sense to you.
I know this and so up to whatever point this makes describing the Return that I saw slightly easier.

If you decide to read the descriptions I write you will have to get past the point were you need to decide if any of this could possibly be true.
If you are stuck needing to decide if you can believe my descriptions then you might as well forget it.
You are not going to believe my descriptions, plain and simple.
If you want to have some idea what happens during a Return then you will need to just simply forget about the need to decide if you can believe my descriptions.

It turns out that my descriptions are very accurate. Not only that but my descriptions are far more accurate in specific details than any ancient descriptions that I have read so far. I am only talking about descriptions I have read that describe the same specific sights.
Also I am not talking about "meanings," instead I am simply talking about the details concerning the sights that I saw. It's not for me to try to tell anyone else what the "meaning," is.
Individual viewers, people who actually see for themselves can decide for themselves what they think it all means.

There are certainly more texts out there and within all of these descriptions of the same things I saw there are many many sights that are described by ancient writers that are exact in detail and basically could not be described in any sort of more accurate way.
I am saying that over all my descriptions are more wide ranging concerning the same specific sights that I saw and overall include more details compared to anything that I have found so far.

I am able to easily understand many ancient things that I read, not my fault.
It's not a case were I'm trying to say that I'm so smart or anything instead it's as simple as this, if you've seen, then you know what the shapes and forms in the Moon's changed Light look like.
This will happen to you as well if you see the next Return and the details within the Moon's changed light.
Suddenly many of the ancient texts you know will make sense to you. Also you will know that my descriptions are accurate.
It turns out that you will be finding out that this is just simply the way it is.

I find that reading ancient texts very difficult overall and many things just don't make sense to me. If it makes sense to me then I know what it is. If it does not mean anything to me then I simply don't know what they are talking about. Sometimes I am able to understand that they are describing the Moon's changed light but beyond that I am simply unable to point to the specific things that are being described.
There are degrees of understanding and I have to be clear about the fact that it's mainly bits and pieces of ancient texts that are clear to me and that overall things are not easy to understand.
Sometimes it is very simple and easy to understand that a Return is being described and sometimes it is not easy to understand that a Return is being described.
All future viewers are going to easily understand these points that I mention.

- Sorry but, I'm not that good at explaining this.
Later people will say;
"I did not understand that there really was an object and that it really does do all those fantastic things with the Moon's light."
Then if they didn't see they may turn around and accuse me of;
Not explaining well enough, so that they would and could have known to look.
If they did look and they did get right up close with the aid of a small backyard telescope, then they are going to say or they may say that I did not;
Explain the Changed Light's indescribable intensity and pressure well enough so that they could have somehow been, more prepared.
Then they'll say or they may say how;
"I should have warned them in some sort of more clearly understood fashion."
I can go on and on, it never ends.
There will always be something else that I should have done or there will always be something else I should have done better or in some sort of clearer fashion.
It's not my fault that I can only understand, and then explain, only up to whatever point.

- I am finally beginning to realize more and more that obviously, none of this is my fault!
I can only do so much. All I can do is my best.
I am not going around trying to get anyone to believe, anything that I say that I saw.
Certain things are easy, certain things are hard, certain other things are very hard, and the rest of it is nearly impossible.
Very obviously, there is nothing that is my fault.

The big ancient place is returning and very soon it is going to roll down and it is going to do the big ancient thing that it does.

I simply can't be blamed for anything, anymore than you can be blamed after you finally actually also see.

-If it turns out that the big ancient things that you thought you knew were just a little bit off..., it's not my fault. Also it isn't anyone's fault.
Remember on that day that I, only saw it, just like you. Just remember that it, things, are no more my fault than they will be your fault or anyone's fault.
How could any of this be anyone's fault? It isn't. There is no blame, at all for any of it, plain and simple.
There are only reasons and questions.
I don't know the reasons and I don't know the answers to the big questions.
I only saw it, the same way that you will also see, if you look.

- Somehow the details of a Return have been lost through time. The biggest thing that happens isn't a part of our world's understanding.
How did this situation come about?
There's a good question to ask. I can only guess that there were and are a whole bunch of major factors in this question. I hesitate to go very far in this direction. The reasons why history, or rather, people have forgotten about what really happens when the Object returns and transforms the light from the Moon are completely out of my area of understanding. However I can say that this situation does exist.

- Anyway's I try not to feel as though I should say that I'm sorry, but it's hard...

- A simple fact is this;
This orbiting object, the Changed and Lasting light event, "the illusion," the entire event, has nothing to do with me except that I saw it.
We are all actually very lucky that it does do the fantastic things that it does somehow do.
The sight of the Awesome Good, and the Shape Effects, makes this fact plainly obvious!

Anyway's, back to the part about how this actually obviously has nothing to do with "me."
I happened to see a train go down the tracks.
Sometime later I found myself reading about how that same train had passed by on the same set of tracks, at an earlier time.
Then sometime after that, I mentioned to the next guy that I thought that same train was going to go by once again.
Sure enough, once again, the train will go by.
Does that somehow make me "a train man?"
I don't think so!
-------------

-Each page is titled for the purpose of providing a general topic to try to write about and comment on. Also these various page topics, are intended to try to further describe in hopefully more detail, various parts of the return viewer guides. Basically the phases or stages of the Changed Light event just to start with, along with other points or topics I know to be important.

-People will say or may say that somehow I'm doing all of this simply for money. No I don't have much money. If there is some money in this at this point I don't see exactly how.
There may or may not be some money in this, I am really not sure.
If some money does eventually come my way I plan to use that money to help my children into the future. Everybody needs money am I am no different.
I can only suppose that I will be criticized from all sorts of various different angles whether I have lots of money or not.

I saw the big thing that happens and if it turns out that I may be able to improve our circumstances and help my children, then I think that I should be allowed, to do so.

-I hope that all of my efforts combined together and taken as a whole, will help future viewers at least partially understand what they are about to see. I also hope that I will be able to help future viewers to understand the very small portion that I understand about what it is that you are looking at, when you are seeing!
Incredibly it all boils down to the plain and simple fact that the sights above the object's upper right horizon are in fact, is in fact, the awesome and incredible, fantastically changed lasting, and solid looking, and eventually, moving powerful light from the Moon!

Also it seems very likely that along with the tops of standing crater rim pieces that remained above the line of the shadow reflecting light from the Sun, the light from background stars may also be a part of the scene that is located down over the object's downward sloping far surface area, the far slope, the upper right horizon area. In particular this may apply in regards to the two fantastic triangle shapes that are seen on the object's, far slope. These two triangle shapes are the two main largest most prominent brilliant shapes that are seen in this region.
I try to understand and describe the many many brilliant shapes that are presented down over the object's far slope above, on, the line of the thickness of the shadow's awesome wave.

Just to start off with, this is the most basic thing to know and understand.
Above the object's rolling surface, everything that is visible, is light!
Most of the light, is light from the Moon. Star light may also be a part of what is being seen along with Sun light that reflected off the tops of standing crater rim pieces.
Also light from the object's surface itself becomes left behind and is somehow still there, starting with the tilting, or spreading wide open and down that the object does when it's light blends and joins with the light from the Moon and becomes changed.
In one fantastic ancient text that I am thinking of in particular this is the point were it is said that the object becomes "undone," and that does describe it.
There is simply no way that an uninformed viewer could ever guess that everything above the rolling surface itself is actually light, during their first time seeing all of the separate sights that are seen in and eventually out of the Moon's very different behaving, amazing changed light.
The Moon just suddenly does not look like the Moon anymore and instead it starts off by looking like some sort of fantastic immense place,
a Magnificent Valley, up there! A very huge new place that remains stationary.

Then the event progresses, and as it does, the chances that anyone would or could suddenly realize and/or understand that they are in fact actually looking at the Moon, decrease very dramatically.
Knowing that it's all about the sight of the changed light from the surface of the Moon is a good place to start because basically that's exactly what most of it is!

I suppose that like many people I don't normally say much or mention my opinions, about this or that. I am not use to saying what I think.
My english grammar is average at best. I don't want my writing to be misinterpreted.
Sometimes things I write can end up sounding different than I intended. I don't always notice these sorts of unintended sounding meanings, or phrases that change the intended meaning of what I am writing.
When I read over what I write it sounds a certain way to me and I don't always notice the types of errors that I am referring to here.
Many times I have suddenly found a place in a sentence that is missing a word. I may have read through this paragraph many times and somehow I have read the word into it's spot without it actually being there and never noticed that this happened.
Then later I notice that there is a place in a sentence that is somehow missing a word. Once in a while the effect of the missing word is that the sentence can sound and mean the opposite way that I intended when you read it and listen to it the way it reads without the word that is missing.

I have also noticed that careless use of the spell check feature has replaced spelling errors with incorrect and unrelated words causing the sentence to make no sense or the meaning is changed.
Then later when I read through I sometimes read the correct word into the sentence without realizing that a wrong word is there and an error exists.
I am mentioning these points and I could mention a few other similar points and examples as a way to hopefully explain and help people understand my situation and some of the possible reasons for the misplaced. misspelled, missing or incoherent word placements and poor sounding sentence structure.
These aren't excuses, they are reasons for some of the difficulties a reader will encounter.
I understand that unfortunately some of these types of errors could cause unintended misunderstandings.
I apologize for this sort of situation.
I try to find errors.
I always find them so I know that there is always more spots were there are still more errors and I still have not noticed them. I have found these types of errors before and I'm sure I will again.
Simply put there are errors and mistakes and grammar problems within the content on this website.

I am slowly chipping away at these sorts of problems and I especially apologize if an error, on my pages has offended anyone in any way.
If you spot a particularly bad grammar error or incorrect word placement, and you most likely will, I am open to suggestions and pointers.
If the change you suggest makes sense to me I will make an effort to make the suggested change.
Thanks for the help.

Sometimes my spelling and grammar errors can cause confusion.
I am able to realize that many of the sights I describe and the effects for the viewer that are caused by the changed light that I describe
mean things to people that I know nothing about.
Certain things I am able to describe are familiar and have meaning to others in all sorts of different ways.

I am just saying what I saw. I don't understand all of the different ways that different people will think about this or that,
or relate what I'm saying to what they know.
This is a very complicated area that I know is real. I don't understand the implications of all of this.
People have to try to understand my limited context.
I don't argue points or argue to convince except in a couple of places.
I do express stronger opinions on the "Save The Object," page.
Also Return preparation and prediction issues are important to me and fundamental overall.

I know that in many cases I am able to help others understand what they know better.
That is obvious to me.
I am just trying my best to describe what I saw.
I am trying my best to do what is right.
I don't know what it all really means and I don't try to say that I do.
I make guesses and I do speculate and ask questions, and I think that's fair and should be allowed.
Also I should be allowed to describe what I saw.
I don't want what I say or do to be accidentally misinterpreted.
Please try to understand that I don't know you and I don't know what you know and I don't know what you believe.
All I know is what I saw and that's what I am talking about and trying to describe here on this website that I am doing for my children
and in a very real way, your children as well.
Please, try to have patience and understanding.
Your patience and understanding does matter and is important.

Thank you.